“This is the main reason it is important to realize that evolution is simply another false religion, and that the temptation people face when confronted with that religion is nothing new.” This is a quote from Dr. Michael Houts affirming that evolution is another false religion. Dr. Houts goes further to present the separation of evolutionists from true science. He is absolutely right. He stated, “It is important for Christians to realize that evolution is simply another erroneous belief, and that they need not be intimidated into believing that the theory is supported by true science. It is also important that Christians not become suspicious of science just because evolutionists and atheists falsely claim it supports their worldview.”
Click here to read the article, “Evolution is Religion – Not Science”.
This is a great article written by Michael G. Houts Ph.D, who “holds a Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering from MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Dr. Houts has received numerous awards, including a NASA Certificate of Appreciation for Exceptional Leadership. His professional activities include serving as Chairman of the Symposium on Space Nuclear Power and Propulsion. Dr. Houts was employed by Los Alamos National Laboratory for 11 years, serving in various positions including Deputy Group Leader. He presently serves as the Nuclear Research Manager for NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center.”
The Breath of God 
Simply because you think in a faith based, mythical way doesn’t mean others do. Evolution is a well founded theory in science that produces predictions and many proven hypothesis. It is both theory and fact. Ignorance like yours is inexcusable in a world where information is rwadily available and it is nearly criminal that you would try to spread your misconceptions.
Your statement falls on its own.
Can you explain why Scott?
Evolution is an embedded theory in the scientific community and not “science”. The statement falls here and upon the accusation of my ignorance and misconceptions being “inexcusable” and “criminal” showing the irrational and impatient mentality of many Darwinists being against what is self-evident and desiring law against an establishment of religion.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Calling evolution a belief does not make it a belief.
True and yet, believing in a conjecture is a belief rather right or wrong.
In what way? Do you mean evolution has been challenged?
I wish I knew what definitions you’re talking about, because I can’t find any inaccuracies in the definitions besides that of “micro-evolution” for adaption and genetic drift caused by geographic, physiological, anatomical, or behavioral factors. “Micro-evolution” is certainly a convenient title for evolution from whoever it originated. I also don’t understand the so-called atheists’ and skeptics’ rights to set boundaries in Biology when it was first the field of the Creationist and certainly the Creator. I doubt that it can be shown that Christians believed adaption and genetic drift were ever heresy 50 years ago and they have certainly traveled the slow road of science as much as the evolutionist.
The Scriptures teach the Christian that the Creation presents the everlasting power and divinity of God being perceived through the things that are made (Romans 1:20). I really don’t see how Creationism has moved anywhere nor do I see Creationism losing any ground in Biology. The arguments of Creationism are as much if not less argued to an end as Evolutionists do for their beliefs.
I appreciate the discussion.