Understanding the “Head-Coverings” in 1 Corinthians 11

Are Christian women neglecting the command for head-coverings in church? Many believe that 1 Corinthians 11 teaches that women must wear cloth coverings hanging down from their heads when practicing their faith around men. The interpretations of this passage vary concerning whether the covering is spiritual, garment, or hair.

Some consider this section of Scripture as completely cultural and identify all parts as the custom of contention (1 Cor 11:16). However, Christians cannot avoid that the Apostle commanded that Christians must maintain traditions just as delivered to them (1 Cor 11:2). Does the Apostle mean that head-coverings are a part of maintaining traditions from God?

This article provides Scriptures for the reader to better understand this passage within its scriptural context. May God bless your study.

Notice that hair is the only covering mentioned in 1 Corinthians 11. The text says, “But if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her; for her hair is given to her for a covering” (1 Cor 11:15). Verses 6 and 7 use the Greek word katakalupto, which literally means “to cover downward” (Gingrich and Danker’s lexicon, BDAG). By a woman’s head being uncovered, this was the same as having her hair sheared or shaved (1 Cor 11:5-–6). As other scriptures explain, the woman who elaborately arranges her hair uncovers her head and disregards her God-given glory and God’s headship. With long hair being a glory to the woman, the Scriptures teach that the Christian woman should cover her head by letting her hair down in subordination to God’s order of headship and thereby glorify God, Christ, and man (1 Cor 11:3–6). Furthermore, “woman is the glory of man” because man is the “glory of God” (1 Cor 11:7). Each sex has a separate glory.

The woman who washed Jesus’s feet demonstrated how a woman letting her hair down was an act of humility (Luke 7:36–50; cf. Matt 28:9). Lazarus’s sister, Mary, demonstrated humility by wiping Jesus’s feet with hair and anointing Him with oil in preparation for His burial (John 12:1–8). As an academic, Charles Cosgrove cited numerous ancient sources depicting how women let their hair down as an act of humility within the Greco-Roman and Jewish societies (Cosgrove, A Woman’s Unbound Hair, JBL 124 (2005): 675–92).

First Peter 3 and 1 Timothy 2 present how the Apostles instructed modesty and humility among women in 1 Corinthians 11. In 1 Peter 3:1–6, Peter also applied caution to the external decorating of hair and clothing where a woman’s adornment must exist within her heart. First Peter 3:3–4 explains, “Your adornment must not be merely external —braiding the hair, and wearing gold jewelry, or putting on dresses; but let it be the hidden person of the heart, with the imperishable quality of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is precious in the sight of God” (NASB). The braiding of hair appears to put up against the head rather than hanging down from the head. Consider this to understand 1 Corinthians 11. 

God also instructed the Christian women in 1 Timothy 2:9–10, “Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided [woven] hair and gold or pearls or costly garments, but rather by means of good works, as is proper for women making a claim to godliness.” The Apostle described elaborately adorned hair as immodest, insubordinate, and not proper for a woman’s claim to godliness. The immodest women in the church at Corinth had either a short hairstyle that resembled men or were elaborately adorning their hair woven with gold and pearls.

By not letting their hair hang down, women dishonored God’s headship by dishonoring that man is head of woman. This headship is not dominance of one over another, but like God’s headship is to Christ or Christ’s headship to man. Headship implied servant leadership (Mark 10:42–45). By elaborately braiding and adorning hair with gold and pearls, women behaved or appeared as exercising authority over men, and thus they appear to reject the man’s God-given instruction to lead and teach because God created man first for this purpose (1 Tim 2:13–14; cf. 1 Cor 11:3, 7–9).

While culture is not an interpreter of Scripture, note that the pagan custom was for powerful women of authority to braid their hair with gold and pearls, and thereby dress as though higher than others. Pagan women in this time led worship to Diana and Dionysus, and thus women exercised power and influence through the cults (Bruce Morton. Deceiving Winds. Nashville: 21st Century Christian, 2009). Among the churches, some women arranged and adorned their hair with gold and pearls, and they did not let their long hair hang down to show the God-given glory of woman and the glory of man in woman (1 Cor 11:7, 15). By the Spirit of Christ, the Apostles taught that a woman’s hair was to demonstrate modesty and humility to glorify her, man, and God’s headship.

If someone is contentious concerning the custom of women praying to God with heads uncovered, the apostle Paul affirmed the natural way and that the churches of God have no such custom of women praying without hair hanging down (1 Cor 11:13–16). Christians must avoid contention over customs and yet display Christian principles that society can understand. Such head-coverings demonstrate how Christians must live appropriately and modestly considering culture and the times. The dress of Christians must present Christian humility and modesty to the world around them.

First Timothy 2:10 states that women adorn themselves with good works “as is proper for women making a claim to godliness.” This is also the purpose of Paul’s teaching in 1 Corinthians 11. The translators interpret “proper” from the Greek word prepo meaning “becoming,” “appropriate,” or “fitting” (cf. Matt 3:15; Eph 5:3; Titus 2:1; Heb 2:10; 7:26). Therefore, these Christian women were to pray with their heads covered as proper or fitting for demonstrating the headship that God established. These Christian women were to allow their hair to hang down as long hair is a God-given covering and glory. 

In conclusion, these Scriptures guide Christians to naturally present God’s headship as God is head of Christ, Christ is head of man, and man is head of woman. Christians should remain considerate of demonstrating humility and modesty before the world.

Furthermore, consider the insight of James B. Coffman who comments upon a woman’s hair as her covering:

Verse 4
Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoreth his head.

Having his head covered…
Here is where the misunderstanding of this passage begins. This clause, as rendered in the popular versions, is commentary, not Bible. As Echols noted:

“Having his head covered” is a commentary, not a translation. Lenski translated the sense correctly: “having something down from his head.” What the “something” is is neither stated nor implied in 1 Corinthians 11:4.

The logical understanding of this would refer it to “long hair,” being long enough to hang down from the head, as clearly indicated by the apostles’ words a moment later: “If a man have long hair, it is a dishonor to him” (1 Corinthians 11:14).

The ancients accepted Paul’s dictum on this and went so far as to define the length of hair that was considered an infraction of Paul’s words.

“The hair of the head may not grow so long as to come down and interfere with the eyes … cropping is to be adopted … let not twisted locks hang far down from the head, gliding into womanish ringlets.”

Significantly, the words “hang far down” strongly resemble Paul’s words “having something down from his head.” The above is from Clement of Alexandria and was written in the second century.

The notion that Paul in this place referred to the [Hebrew: tallith] (shawl), or [Greek: yarmelke] (skull cap) worn by Jewish worshipers is refuted by the fact that the Greek New Testament does not indicate in this verse an artificial covering of any kind. This does not mean, however, that Paul would have approved of the use of either in Christian worship. “For Paul such a covering probably symbolized that the Jewish male continued in spiritual darkness, from which Christians had been liberated.” We may therefore interpret this verse as a simple admonition that it was a disgrace for any long-haired Christian male to participate in praying and prophesying; and this interpretation certainly harmonizes with verse 14. History has certainly vindicated this view; because universal human behavior has departed from it only in isolated instances and for relatively very short periods of time. (emp. added)

Referring to coverings in verse 5, Coffman wrote,

With her head unveiled…
The word here rendered ‘unveiled’ is [Greek: akatakaluptos]. “There is no intrinsic meaning in this word which suggests either the covering material or the object covered; it is simply a general word.” (See under 1 Corinthians 11:15.) Only in 1 Cor. 11:15 does Paul mention any kind of garment ([Greek: peribolaion]) and even there he stated that the woman’s hair took the place of it. [Katakaluptos] means covered completely. [Akatakaluptos] means not completely covered. Thus again, the passage falls short of mentioning any kind of garment. To suppose that Paul here meant “mantle” or “veil” or any such thing is to import into this text what is not in it. We have seen that he was speaking of “hair” in 1 Cor. 11:4; and that is exactly what he is speaking of here. “Not completely covered” would then refer to the disgraceful conduct of the Corinthian women in cropping their hair, after the manner of the notorious Corinthian prostitutes; which, if they did it, was exactly the same kind of disgrace as if they had shaved their heads. It is crystal clear that Paul is not speaking of any kind of garment; because he said in 1 Cor. 11:15, below, “For her hair is given her instead of a covering.” (emp. added)

David Lipscomb addressed this very subject saying,

I understand that long hair serves as a veil or token of her subjection to authority; and if she has not long hair, she must cover her head when she approaches God in worship. I understand this to refer to her approach to God in private or in public assembly when others lead in worship. Many interpret this to mean that she is to do these things when she leads in public worship, but the Scripture says nothing of this. (Q & A, emp. added)

Within this previous context of hair as the “covering,” Lipscomb concluded this statement, “We understand verse 16 to say that the churches of God have no such custom as the women appearing in worship with uncovered or shorn heads.” The expectation was for women to have hanging hair to show honor to God, man to Christ, and woman to man.

However, some may ask about verses 5–6. These verses seem to imply that not covering with a garment is like a woman’s hair being sheared or shaved. Paul is simply affirming that short hair and hair drawn up on the head is the same as a cropped or shaved head. A literal translation is:

Every woman praying or prophesying with head uncovered disgraces her head; for this is also one and the same as being shaved. For if the woman is not covered, let her also become sheared; and if the disgrace to the woman is to become sheared or shaved, let her remain covered. (1 Cor 11:5–6)

Coffman agreed,

If Paul meant “hair,” why did he use the word “covered”? The answer is that in the vocabulary of the Old Testament “to uncover the head” was to shave off the hair. When Nadab and Abihu sinned (Leviticus 10:1ff), God commanded Aaron not to “uncover his head” in mourning at their death; and this meant not to cut off his hair (the customary sign of mourning). Job shaved his head when he learned his children were dead (Job 1:20). Many examples of this usage could be cited. (emp. added)

“If it is a shame to a woman to be cropped or shaven, let her be covered” in verse 6 clearly refers to a covering of hair as seen in 1 Corinthians 11:15, “And if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her; for her long hair is given to her for a covering.

What about verse 10’s reference to angels: “because of the angels“? Verse 10 is referring to authority. This scripture shows how women should have authority on her head. The woman who prophesies also receives revelation from God through angels to prophesy (Heb 2:2; Rev 1:1) and the woman has her prayers delivered by angels (Rev 8:3–4). This instruction has to do with the woman’s service in prayer and teaching before God. She is to serve with apparent respect and modesty. Therefore, “every woman praying or prophesying with her head uncovered dishonors her head” (1 Cor 11:5).

By not covering her head, the Christian woman dishonors herself being that God created her as the glory of man and in the image of God. Remember verse 3, “But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.” The woman is subordinating to the man by her modesty and covering. Her hair hanging down is her glory for she is the glory of man. This is how the Christian woman honors the headship of God, Christ, and man.

About Scott Shifferd Jr.

Minister, church of Christ in Jacksonville, FL. Husband and father of four. Email: ScottJon82[at]yahoo.com
This entry was posted in Christian, Church of Christ and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

625 Responses to Understanding the “Head-Coverings” in 1 Corinthians 11

  1. Cris says:

    Kate, you have touched my heart and inspired me. Thank you.


  2. Pingback: Daniel Baggett Divorce | Fast 16 Bit Radio

  3. Okechukwu Odulukwe says:

    I think you got that place wrong, lets start frm verse 4 and 5, and it says, every man praying or prophesying having his covered, dishonours his head, but every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head, for that is even all one if she were shaven, if you understand these places to mean hairs, then you are simply saying that any man that hav hairs on his head while praying or prophesying, dishonoures his head, that means that every man is a victim of that, but those places didnt mean hairs, they mean outer covering of hair with materials like scalf, veil, skul cap, face cap are allowed by man but a woman should cover her hairs with all that in praying or prophesying, lets run to verse 15, and it says, but if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to: for her hair is given her for a covering, so you see that this place to connectinn with praying and prophesying that paul talked about in verse 4and5, paul was trying to say, that a woman is permitted to do all other things with long hairs except in praying and prophesying, so women are cover their heads with not hairs but with eternal materials but they are allowed to have long hairs as their covering outside praying and prophesying,


    • I appreciate your kind reply in correction. I reread 1 Corinthians 11 to reconsider and fairly think on your observation.

      However, I think you missed that the hair as a covering is long for woman and is not the covering for the man, so that the man is to have short hair and thus his head is uncovered. There is no garment covering specified in the text; although, I can see someone implying it if they have short hair. Furthermore, 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Peter 3 indicate an immodest uncovering with braided hair of pearls and gold that should not uncover the head with God’s glory of long hair. I must add that long hair is a covering if a woman has long hair (1 Cor 11:15).

      How do you perceive a change from praying and prophesying to everyday life? Do you see this starting in verse 7, 10, or 14? I can see that the Apostle does refer to hair in everyday life in verses 14-15, and that he applies the modesty and covering of hair for praying and prophesying.

      I leave this for your further observations. I am willing to listen. Thank you for your gentle spirit.


  4. Head Covering Wife says:

    I do not want to get into a debate about what the scripture says. I only want to share my testimony. I am a married woman to one man. My husband is a godly man, leader, and father. He is not perfect, but loves God and His Word. We have been married for 16 years. I thought I was a godly wife. I am a stay at home mom. We choose to homeschool our children and honor God in all we say and do in our home. We have attended many denominations throughout our many moves through out our married life. I thought I was a godly, respectable wife.
    My life changed when I started studying and meditating on Ephesians 5:22-33 or so. I always thought I was being respectful. The Holy Spirit revealed through God’s Word that I had a heart issue of true submission. Until this moment in time I was a product of feminisim. I didn’t think I was because I was married and to boot a stay at home mom. But I had to grapple with my heart of not truly submitting to the authority of my husband, and he is a godly, caring. supporitve, and excellent provider for our family. Why would I not submit to his authority? I had a heart issue that was deep rooted and hidden. I was haughty and unyeilding. I was not practicing my “glory” of being under the authority of my husband.

    One day I came across a facebook post about head coverings. I could not stop thinking about the words of 1 Corinthians 11. Every thought I had seemed to go back to…. are you walking in authority and glory, or disobedience and shame? I wrestled with God over whether or not I was being called to obey, head cover or not to head cover. Trust and Obey for there is no other way to be happy in Jesus…. the simple song kept playing in my head. My first step to obeying was I asked my husband did he care if I head covered or not. I asked him to study scripture with me. He said he was not opposed to me either way. He wanted me to obey what the Lord was telling me. I had a moment of whoosh! I was off scott free, my husband did not have conviction. I was doing a happy dance. But the Holy Spirit would not stop convicting my heart. I love Jesus, I had to obey.

    I will never forget the first time I head covered during our family devotions. I cried tears of shame. I cried because I was dying to my flesh. I had to explain to my children who were tweens, why I was all of sudden doing something so different. I covered at home for a while and now I obey and cover during worship. It is still hard to be the only person at worship to cover. It is truly a flesh dying experience every time. I have had to go through the whole what covering do I use, does it match? Will it mess up my hair? Will I distract other believers? Will I be made fun of? Will I have to tell people? Will I be accused of taking women back 100 years?
    And every time I obey I am blessed. Every time I cover my head I honor God and my husband. Every time I cover my head I am walking in obedience. I do not go around preaching head covering. I am not evening telling my no teenage girls to cover, I had them search scripture, and what does God say to them. My husband still is not demanding that I cover my head. It is between me and God. My obedience has encouraged more obedience from him.

    I appreciate all the scholars that have broken down scripture past transcripts and gone back to original text. The point is God was asking me to obey without understanding it. The Holy Spirit prompted my heart to obey and I wanted proof of what I am doing is right. It is right every time I cover my head because He told me too, not because someone agrees that I should cover. My prayer is that you will have true obedience in all of your hearts. Whether it is about head covering or anything he is telling you to obey, I encourage you, obey. Are you walking in the right position God has called you be?


    • Michael Baggett says:

      God bless you. God certainly needs more women who will put Him first in spite of the world calling them to take the headship over men. When men and women work God’s plan the family is stronger, society is stronger and God is glorified.


  5. jeff.byler@gmail.com says:

    I suppose that if the long hair is the covering than it logically(?) follows that a woman only needs to wear(?!) her long hair while she is praying or prophesying otherwise she can take her long hair off. Or that, as the passage states, if it is a shame for her to have short hair, (be uncovered) all she has to do to avoid this shame is to cut her hair. (verses 5 and 6) Also an illogical argument. For these reasons no sincere person can deny the fact that Paul is not talking about long hair, he is talking about covering the fallen glory of man, the woman’s hair, and bringing her head under the subjection of godly authority.

    19th century to present reflect these changes in Evangelical churches and general society; Women’s rights, dropping of the practice of the headship veiling, divorce and remarriage, sexual revolution, women pastors, confusion about the roles of men and women in society and homosexuality. Just like Baptism and Communion play a physical role in preserving spiritual truth, so the Headship Covering preserves important spiritual truth to do with God’s authority structure.

    Liked by 2 people

Comments Welcome:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s