Did Paul Write His Own Opinions Apart from Inspiration in 1 Corinthians 7?

Does Paul teach his opinions apart from inspiration in 1 Corinthians 7 and in other similar verses like 2 Corinthians 11:17 and 13:10? Many people say, “Yes”, but the answer is actually “No”. Paul does not give his man-made opinions in any of these passages, and he continues to instruct word-for-word as always by the leading of the Spirit. Let’s take a look at the Scriptures concerning Paul’s inspiration and then what 1 Corinthians 7 really says.

First, Paul wrote by inspiration of the Spirit even unto every word. In 1 Corinthians 14:37, Paul stated, “If any man thinks himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him take knowledge of the things which I write unto you, that they are the commandment of the Lord.” In Galatians 1:11-12, he also wrote, “For I make known to you, brethren, as touching the Gospel which was preached by me, that it is not after man. For neither did I receive it from man, nor was I taught it, but through revelation of Jesus Christ.” Then in 1 Corinthians 2, Paul declared that what he taught was from God even to every word and that this was from the Spirit. Evidently, Paul “spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit” (2 Peter 1:21). It is clear that Paul’s instructions were the Lord’s instructions, and that these were written and spoken by the leading of the Holy Spirit.

Second, let’s see what 1 Corinthians 7 says. The very first verse that is thought to show Paul teaching his opinion separate from inspiration is verse 6. Verse 6 states, “But this I say by way of concession, not of commandment.” Concession means permission. Paul did not solely say, “I say by way of concession”, but “But this I say by way of concession”. The word “But” is the Greek conjunction de, which can be translated “but” or “and”. All conjunctions like this one conjoin statements, and this verse is conjoined to its pretext in verse 5. Note also the word “this”. “This” is a pronoun, and every pronoun has an antecedent. The antecedent of the pronoun “this” is the discourse of verse 5. Verse 5 is the statement that is “by way of concession” to those who are married that they have “permission” to stop sexual relations for a season to pray, but this saying is “by way of concession, not of commandment”, so you do not have to. By the leading of the Spirit, Paul gives them inspired permission to do so. Therefore, verse 6 in no way presents Paul speaking his own thoughts and not the Lord’s. Here Paul is speaking the Lord’s instruction by inspiration. Let’s continue to look at the rest of 1 Corinthians 7. See, even in verses 7 & 8, Paul speaks that he would that all men were like himself, but these verses are as much an inspired suggestion as the permission given in verses 5 & 6.

In verse 10, Paul stated, “But unto the married I give charge, not I, but the Lord” and then in verse 12, “But to the rest say I, not the Lord“. There are two different interpretations of these verses. Either Paul was separating and contrasting what he said by his own opinion from what the Lord says as a command, or Paul was presenting His commands by the Spirit in contrast from what the Lord said by command in His ministry on earth. Which one is the true interpretation? This can be briefly resolved with a few verses.

Look again at verse 10, “But unto the married I give charge, not I, but the Lord“. This is the answer to this whole controversy. Paul gives a charge to not separate or divorce one’s spouse clarifying that in giving the charge it came from the Lord first in His earthly ministry. Yet, the charge also came from Paul in being guided by the Spirit. See, Paul’s statement in verse 10 does not exclude Paul saying “I give charge”, and likewise, Paul’s charge does not exclude Christ’s Spirit from being the source and authority in verse 12. In other words, Paul said in verse 10, “I give charge, not onlyI, but the Lord”, and then in verse 12, “to the rest say I, not only the Lord”. Paul was right. Jesus did specifically give commands about marriage in His earthly ministry originating with Jesus, and with additional guidance from Christ’s Spirit, Paul is clearly charged those Christians, who may be married to unbelievers.

The Apostle Paul was linking His inspiration by Christ’s Spirit with the authority of the Lord’s words in His earthly ministry. Note 1 Corinthians 7:17 where Paul spoke of this discussion which begins in verse 12 as “But to the rest say I, not the Lord”. He says, “so I ordain in all the churches”. Does Paul ordain his opinions in all the churches? No. Remember Paul stated that what he writes are the commandment of the Lord (1 Cor. 14:37). Paul stated a similar statement in 1 Corinthians 4:17, “For this cause have I sent unto you Timothy, who is my beloved and faithful child in the Lord, who shall put you in remembrance of my ways which are in Christ, even as I teach everywhere in every church.” See, Paul’s ways, “my ways” are as Paul says, “my ways which are in Christ”, and these are not his opinions. In Greek, Paul’s can be translated “the ways from me”. See, in writing this letter by the Spirit, Paul also stated, “For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you,” (1 Cor. 11:23-24). Paul clearly presenting what Christ had said before in His earthly ministry. Paul presented by inspiration what he says by Christ through the Spirit along with what Christ said when on earth. There is no such passage that has Paul teaching his opinions.

Paul also says that, “I have no commandment of the Lord, but I give my judgment” (1 Cor. 7:25). In this passage, Paul gives judgment in contrast to command, or in other words, he gives wisdom and permission having authority from God via the Holy Spirit. In this verse, he says that he is “one that has obtained mercy of the Lord to be trustworthy”. Also in 1 Corinthians 7:40, Paul gives instruction after his judgment, and he says, “and I think that I also have the Spirit of God“. His statement of “I think” is not one of uncertainty as conveyed in English, but it is one of certainty like in 1 Corinthians 4:9, “For I think that God has exhibited us apostles as last of all, like men sentenced to death, because we have become a spectacle to the world, to angels, and to men”. Is Paul uncertain about God exhibiting the Apostles last of all to endure many things? Therefore, we know that Paul speaks with certainty about his trustworthy judgment being one, who is guided by the Spirit, because Paul’s judgment  and wisdom is by guidance of the Holy Spirit (2 Pet. 1:20-21, 3:15-16).

Lastly, Paul many times spoke a common phrase like “I speak” without giving his opinion, because he said, “I speak by the Lord” (Eph. 4:17). There is no separation of inspiration between Paul and the Lord here nor anywhere else (1 Cor. 1:10, Rom. 15:30, 1 Thess. 5:27).

First Thessalonians 2:13 says,

“And for this cause we also thank God without ceasing, that, when you received from us the word of the message, the word of God, you accepted it not as the word of men, but, as it is in truth, the word of God, which also works in you that believe.”

About Scott Shifferd Jr.

Minister, church of Christ in Jacksonville, FL. Husband and father of four. Email: ScottJon82[at]yahoo.com
This entry was posted in Bible, Christianity, Scriptures and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Did Paul Write His Own Opinions Apart from Inspiration in 1 Corinthians 7?

  1. Joe says:

    As a new Christian, I’d been told that the words in the bible were breathed into the writers by God. Theopneustos is the word I was told Paul used in 2 Tim. 3:16.
    But I don’t see how God could breathe the words “not the Lord” into Paul in this passage. It seems that that would be like saying, “Write this down Paul, because I command it. But make sure to say that these are not actually my words.”
    I’m quite new to theology, and not a deep thinker either, and it would be very much appreciated if any responses could take my limitations into account. I’m not trying to insult any contrary viewpoint; I’m just trying to learn.
    Thanks

    Like

    • Hello Joe,

      Paul is clearly guided by the Spirit, and he certainly gave commands from the Lord either by what the Lord said or by what Christ’s Spirit revealed to him. Paul also was able to give the best of wisdom as we see him doing here in contrast to Jesus’ earthly ministry (e.g. Solomon).

      What I see clearly here in 1 Corinthians 7:10-12 is that Jesus did address separation and divorce in His earthly ministry, and yet Jesus did not specifically speak about whether a believer should remain with an believer, so Paul by the Lord’s Spirit was able to give that charge.

      Remember that Jesus told His Apostles that they would receive all truth by the Spirit (John 14:26). Jesus also told them that they did not have all truth yet, and that He would send His Spirit to guide them in to all truth (John 16:12-13). Jesus was clear that the words of His Spirit were also from Him. Therefore, there are commands given through the Apostles from Acts to Revelation in addition to Christ’s charge in His earthly ministry.

      Hence, Paul was able to say that he gave charge and not just him, but the Lord in reference to Jesus’ earthly ministry, and then Paul was able to additionally reveal the Lord’s charge from His Spirit in the Apostle Paul.

      I hope that helps to clarify some things. If you see any holes in this understanding, then please let me know. Your questions are welcome.

      Like

  2. Scott says:

    Honestly, I was not theorizing and the post defends itself. If you mean by reading “the Bible at face value”: reading within the context, then yes I do read within the context.

    I don’t have a disagreement that thoughts are presented in the Bible that are not directly from God. We can look to the Pharisees and even Satan tempting Christ to see the fallacy of such an idea. At the same time, why would Paul’s words to Timothy to bring his things not be inspired? What if the Spirit did guide Paul to not only get those belongings, but also to write to Timothy? This does show the Christian relationship that Paul had with Timothy just as Paul’s greetings a stated with great love in his epistles. What motive would Paul have for corrupt or is he insane? I believe that Scriptures to present the Apostle as neither corrupt nor insane.

    Now, you also admit that you have a bias against Paul since you think that he is an “idiot” but that would be blasphemy against God if you just don’t accept Paul’s words as instructions from God because the instruction offends you. How do you know that your disagreement is not with God? I hope you’ll read his writings over and over again, and be fair. I find it best to understand Paul especially in Romans by reading the whole of each writing all the way through at one time. I believe that you undermine the authority of the Scriptures as able to make one complete and that the Scriptures are equipped to all good deeds. I hope your take your studies further especially in considering even conservative defenses to the criticisms against the Scriptures even in collection. You may aid yourself in reading other such articles on this matter here. I do believe that your salvation is at stake since your walk in the light cannot be complete when you are skeptical of what is the light.

    For the record, I do not believe nor see any contradiction in any of Paul’s writings being guided by the Holy Spirit. I do not believe that Christ’s words would contradict themselves. Christ said that he gave His words unto His disciples and that the Spirit will guide into all truth (John 16:13, 17:8). Christ also said, “If they have kept My saying, they will also keep yours.” The Lord also said that His words are spirit and life (John 6:63), and that these words would never pass away (Matt. 24:35).

    I appreciate you writing and I am willing to honestly consider your evidence for your understanding. I hope grace and peace to you in the Lord.

    Like

  3. Max says:

    This is only your theorizing, it is not based upon reading the Bible at face value. If there are specific extra commentaries included the Bible which were not directly inspired by God, it does not negate the rest of the Bible and the clear inspired direct revelations and commands from God Himself which are certainly included in the Bible.

    To me there are clearly other (but rare) passages then this which imply they too are not directly inspired, some also are just historical recordings of events or details of personal orders like when Paul told someone to bring certain items to him when he was traveling. I see it as some things Paul was inspired by God to write and some he was not, and he himself even said this “I, NOT the LORD”. The only reason we try and deny this is the fact that we don’t want to believe part of the Bible may not be inspired by God. Fact is I think Paul will have a lot of answering to do on judgment day and a lot of believers will want to punch his lights out for his extra Biblical commentaries and boastful ramblings which he went into at times.

    It is not wise to argue certain ideas based upon certain of the writings of Paul as they contradict themselves if read literally many times. Best to stick to the clear inspired statements by Paul only, and use other books from the Bible and the gospels when talking to unbelievers. The books of Paul question will never be answered in this life as far as I am concerned, but I personally don’t like him, I think he was quite an idiot by reading many statements he made. This bothers me but I am not saved by accepting Paul’s boastful or rambling commentaries, I am saved by faith in Christ. On judgment day this Paul question will hopefully be answered.

    Like

    • Glenn says:

      I know this is long past the date of this post, but I find this post repulsive. Paul was CHOSEN on the road to Damascus by our Savior. I would say that you, sir, are quite the idiot. You say Paul is a boaster and rambling, and idiot, and yet this great man was the primary instrument that God used to ‘graft’ GENTILES into the tree? No, you are not saved by Paul, but read the previous. I feel sorry for you. You will have some accounting to do on judgement day sir.

      Like

  4. Scott says:

    You’re welcome, Curtis.

    Like

  5. Curtis says:

    Thanks for clarifying the word “but”, I was a little confused on that.

    Like

  6. Gordy! says:

    I am very anxious about his one. I’ve been interested in this for some time now.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s